Navan 2:52 Result
Millbrook Food Group 100 Years Celebration Handicap Hurdle (Div I)
Result
| Pos | Margin | Horse | Jockey | Trainer | Form | SP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | won | 00-775 | — | |||
| 2 | — | 536P31 | — | |||
| 3 | — | P70-P7 | — |
The Verdict
FormCast selectionPure LogicConfidence 4/5Didn't win
Pure Logic sets the standard on OR (98, top-rated) and her recent form line reads 536P31 - that final "1" (last time out) shows she's crossed the line first with this trip/ground suiting, and she's fit having run just 28 days ago. She carries a tongue-tie now and drops into a big field but with a 5lb claiming rider on board she gets weight relief. Compared to the next best on the weights - Classy Cc (95) and Champagne Diamond/Tuckmill (94) - none of those come into this with as much recent, positive form; Classy Cc hasn't run in 130 days and her form figures (3029-4) are stale, while Champagne Diamond and Tuckmill are workmanlike types without a recent win. Glendaars Secret (93) is interesting on class but has only run twice in over 100 days with a rock-bottom third run (060) suggesting fitness questions. Sekakarma progressed nicely to win last time (594231) and Noble Rocco is a lightly-raced improving type for a top yard (Elliott) but is unproven at this trip/level against more experienced rivals. Weighing it up, Pure Logic's rating, fitness, and recent winning form make her the one to beat in a competitive but ultimately not top-class field. She looks the most complete package on official figures and current form, and represents a fair betting proposition without being over-bet given the big field masks her true standout claims.
Runners & Form
| No. | Draw | Horse | Age | Jockey | Trainer | OR | Form | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | ★ | 6 | 98 | 536P31 | — | ||
| Pure Logic sets the standard on OR (98, top-rated) and her recent form line reads 536P31 - that final "1" (last time out) shows she's crossed the line first with this trip/ground suiting, and she's fit having run just 28 days ago. | ||||||||
| 10 | 0 | 9 | 85 | P9P830 | — | |||
| 11 | 0 | 7 | 84 | 0-24P4 | — | |||
| 12 | 0 | 5 | 80 | 055694 | — | |||
| 13 | 0 | 6 | 80 | 000-83 | — | |||
| 14 | 0 | 8 | 75 | 0-0087 | — | |||
| 15 | 0 | ✓ | 6 | 73 | 00-775 | — | ||
| 16 | 0 | 12 | 72 | 9F/2-P | — | |||
| 3 | 0 | 6 | 94 | 5/0-86 | — | |||
| 4 | 0 | 10 | 94 | P70-P7 | — | |||
| 5 | 0 | 7 | 92 | 9-634U | — | |||
| 6 | 0 | 6 | 91 | 0860-3 | — | |||
| 7 | 0 | 5 | 90 | 9P3753 | — | |||
| 8 | 0 | 9 | 87 | 594231 | — | |||
| 9 | 0 | 4 | 87 | 7973 | — | |||
| NR | 0 | 6 | 95 | 3029-4 | — | |||
| NR | 0 | 6 | — | 84 | P26-10 | — | ||
| NR | 0 | 5 | — | 93 | 060 | — | ||
| NR | 0 | 7 | — | 72 | 9PP-PP | — | ||