Navan 7:40 Result
Racing Again This Saturday Fillies Maiden
Result
| Pos | Margin | Horse | Jockey | Trainer | Form | SP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | won | 542 | — | |||
| 2 | — | 02 | — | |||
| 3 | — | 54 | — |
The Verdict
FormCast selectionMawhibahConfidence 4/5Won ✓
This is a sprawling 23-runner fillies maiden with plenty of unraced/unexposed types, so leaning on the most consistently progressive form is the safest route. Mawhibah is the highest-rated horse in the field (OR 74) and her form figures 542 show a filly building nicely - a 4th, then a clear-cut second last time (18 days ago), suggesting she's crying out to break her maiden and is fit and ready to strike now. She's trained by Joseph Patrick O'Brien, a top yard with excellent strike-rate placing fillies to win maidens, and Sheridan continues aboard suggesting stable confidence. The main knock is her wide draw (22 of 23), but at 1m2f on a galloping Navan track that's less of a hindrance than over shorter trips, and a canny enough jockey can afford to sit and use the pace. Saxony Charms (OR75, form 355) is the other consistent type and主要 rival, but her form of thirds/fifths looks a shade behind Mawhibah's upward trajectory, and blinkers first-time adds a slight query. Several fancied stable inmates (Fairylike, Near Perfection, Chosen One) carry big-team hype but have modest or sparse form to back it up, and Chosen One's rating (69) is below Mawhibah's. Given the depth of unexposed maidens, I want to side with the filly showing the clearest evidence of assessable, improving form and a positive job to do - that's Mawhibah. She looks the value versus market assumptions that will likely favour the glamour O'Brien/Coolmore juveniles on pedigree alone.
Runners & Form
| No. | Draw | Horse | Age | Jockey | Trainer | OR | Form | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 7 | – | 28 | — | |||
| 10 | 22 | ✓ ★ | 3 | 74 | 542 | — | ||
| This is a sprawling 23-runner fillies maiden with plenty of unraced/unexposed types, so leaning on the most consistently progressive form is the safest route. | ||||||||
| 11 | 16 | 3 | – | 5 | — | |||
| 12 | 19 | 3 | – | 09 | — | |||
| 13 | 2 | 3 | – | 800 | — | |||
| 14 | 6 | 3 | 75 | 355 | — | |||
| 15 | 21 | 3 | 73 | 68433 | — | |||
| 16 | 17 | 3 | – | 54 | — | |||
| 17 | 4 | 3 | – | 7 | — | |||
| 18 | 11 | 3 | – | 02 | — | |||
| 2 | 9 | 6 | – | - | — | |||
| 20 | 1 | 3 | – | 0 | — | |||
| 21 | 5 | 3 | – | — | ||||
| 22 | 13 | 3 | – | — | ||||
| 23 | 23 | 3 | – | — | ||||
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 71 | 5-2294 | — | |||
| 5 | 14 | 3 | – | 6 | — | |||
| 6 | 12 | 3 | – | 4 | — | |||
| 7 | 20 | 3 | – | 0 | — | |||
| 8 | 10 | 3 | – | 3 | — | |||
| 9 | 7 | 3 | – | 06 | — | |||
| NR | 18 | 3 | - | 6 | — | |||
| NR | 15 | 3 | 69 | 0-5628 | — | |||