Market Rasen 2:30 Result
Market Rasen Racecourse Conference & Events Mares' Maiden Hurdle Race (GBB Race)
Result
| Pos | Margin | Horse | Jockey | Trainer | Form | SP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | won | 65 | — | |||
| 2 | — | -332F2 | — | |||
| 3 | — | /- | — |
The Verdict
FormCast selectionNo More TeardropsConfidence 4/5Didn't win
This looks a moderate mares' maiden hurdle and No More Teardrops stands out on form. Her solitary run shows a winning effort (1-), and although she's been off since (178 days), that was likely a summer break with a view to this campaign - Jamie Snowden's yard is strong with lightly raced sorts returning fresh, and Gavin Sheehan is a shrewd booking. A mare who has already won/placed well suggests more scope than most of this maiden field, many of whom are debutants or have modest form figures (9-96, 77, 65). Elated is the most experienced runner with a string of clearly-placed efforts (-332F2) and will go well, but has already had plenty of chances without breaking through (a fall included), and carries a penalty/headgear addition suggesting connections are still troubleshooting. Mighty Dink and Lara K both come from powerful yards (Skelton, C Williams) but their form figures (6, 7) are unproven and vague. Poets Pearl (Harry Derham, in a headgear now) also has a break in her form but only a fourth on debut to work with - less convincing than No More Teardrops' apparent win. On balance, No More Teardrops offers the%92best combination of proven ability and fitness upside, and should be well informed for this after a break. She looks the strongest each-way and win threat in a race with few standout proven performers.
Runners & Form
| No. | Draw | Horse | Age | Jockey | Trainer | OR | Form | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 5 | 98 | -332F2 | — | |||
| 2 | 0 | 5 | – | 7 | — | |||
| 3 | 0 | 4 | – | /- | — | |||
| 4 | 0 | 4 | – | 9-96 | — | |||
| 5 | 0 | 4 | – | 6 | — | |||
| 6 | 0 | ★ | 4 | – | 1- | — | ||
| This looks a moderate mares' maiden hurdle and No More Teardrops stands out on form. | ||||||||
| 7 | 0 | 4 | – | 4- | — | |||
| 8 | 0 | 4 | – | 77 | — | |||
| 9 | 0 | ✓ | 3 | – | 65 | — | ||